Some concepts:

How can you train boredom:

Developmental boredom

Sherry Turkle draws on Winnicott and Erikson to argue that childhood boredom is not a deficit but a developmental driver. For Winnicott, a child’s capacity to be bored — closely linked to the capacity to play contentedly alone while in the quiet presence of a parent — is a critical sign of psychological health. Erik Erikson likewise argued that children thrive when given time and stillness; the “shiny objects” of today’s childhood demand time and interrupt stillness, leaving no space for the child’s own imagination to fill.

Physical materials (clay, blocks, finger paints) impose natural resistance and slow children down. Digital media eliminate that friction — always responsive, always stimulating — substituting stimulus-response loops for the creative void that boredom opens.

To reclaim solitude we have to learn to experience a moment of boredom as a reason to turn inward, to defer going “elsewhere” at least some of the time.

(Turkle, Reclaiming Conversation, p. 62)

In the classroom, Turkle argues boredom is an invitation, not a problem: “a moment of boredom can be an opportunity to go inward to your imagination, an opportunity for new thinking.” This is the pedagogical version of Solitude: the teacher who rescues students from every moment of disengagement is preventing the inward turn that genuine learning requires.

Resources

On boredom and Deliberate Practice:

The skill-building aspect of deliberate practice, which is a flavor of deep work, can be boring and tedious. Training to tolerate boredom and mute its impact is crucial to mastering this kind of deep work. If you don’t develop tolerance for boredom, you may struggle with the deep work required in the course and beyond. Tolerating boredom in this context is likened to an athlete tolerating muscle soreness